Inter g33

Home> Motherboards by Gary Key on August 28, 2007 7:00 AM EST Posted in Motherboards Synthetic Graphics PerformanceThe 3DMark series of benchmarks developed and provided by Futuremark are among the most widely used tools for benchmark reporting and comparisons. Although the benchmarks are very useful for providing apples-to-apples comparisons across a broad array of GPU and CPU configurations they are not a substitute for actual application and gaming benchmarks. In this sense we consider the 3DMark benchmarks to be purely synthetic in nature but still very valuable for providing consistent measurements of performance.In our first test, the G33 makes for a great showing against the X1250 offerings. So we are being a bit sarcastic in that announcement as we consider these results to be anything but great considering it is the later part of 2007. The G33 platform like our X1250 platforms could not complete the Shader Mark 3.0 tests since it is not supported on this chipset. The X1250 did exceed the G33 in the CPU tests. In fact, the CPU test is where the X1250 shined in this test, almost to the point of making us wonder if this test really has any relevance at this point. General System PerformanceThe PCMark05 benchmark developed and provided by Futuremark was designed for determining overall system performance for the typical home computing user. This tool provides both system and component level benchmarking results utilizing subsets of real world applications or programs. This benchmark is useful for providing comparative results across a broad array of Graphics subsystems, CPU, Hard Disk, and Memory configurations along with multithreading results. In this sense we consider the PCMark benchmark to be both synthetic and real world in nature while providing consistency in our benchmark results.The margins are very close in the PCMark05 results with the G33 platform showing a minor advantage over the X1250 platforms due to better storage system performance results. While this benchmark is designed around actual application usage, we will see if these results mirror our application testing.The Office 2003 test from the PC WorldBench 6.0 benchmark test suite features a number of test scripts that simulate general office tasks in Access, PowerPoint, Excel, and Word.These tests consistently favored the Intel G33 chipset due to improved memory bandwidth and slightly lower latencies which are important in this series of applications. The ASRock board scores about 4% better than the abit board and this

La estabilidad se midio ejecutando 3DMark 05 y un Super Pi de 32M.ECS G33T-M2 | Resultados de las PruebasObtuvimos resultados parejos, en la prueba de 1M, es un empate, pero en la de 2M vemos que la balanza se inclina un poco a favor de la placa MSI.En estas 2 pruebas, las cuales miden distintas areas de nuestro procesador, obtuvimos resultados bastante similares, mostrandonos que en esta parte la ganancia con el nuevo chipset es poca, es mas, en algunos caso queda por debajo que su antecesor. En el Ancho de banda de las memorias, obtenemos resultados que no favorecen al nuevo chipset G33, vemos que en las 2 pruebas, el chipset G965 obtiene mejores resultados, opacando a la estrella de la noche. En los test sinteticos como lo son, los famosos 3DMark, los resultados son parejos, solo que en el 3dmark 03, el chipset G33 saca una ventaja notoria sobre su antecesor. Bueno, pcmark nos da un resultado de como rinde el sistema en general, es un test bien completo, que mide graficos, lectura de memorias, de discos duros, etc… En este salio victorioso el G965, pero por poco. Esto se puede deber a que los drivers para los chipset 965 estan mucho mas maduros que los del G33. Pasamos al punto que es de los mas importantes a analizar antes de comprar una placa madre con graficos integrados, ya que, es importante elegir una placa que tenga la mejor calidad de graficos posible, aqui es donde el nuevo chipset sale a lucirse, dejando totalmente opacado el rendimiento del G965.Vemos como en todos los juegos el G33 obtiene muy buenos numeros, y realmente bastante mejores que el G965, es en esta seccion donde el nuevo chipset de Intel tiene una gran mejora, y la podemos apreciar en los graficos, donde vemos muy buenos fps. En la compresión, la diferencia de tiempo no es tan pareja, vemos que el G33 se separa por 41 segundos, algo que en la practica habitual se hace notar. En Photoshop la diferencia que hay es infima, tan solo 2 segundos. En este bench obtenemos resultados parejos, por no decir iguales, el manejo de los discos duros por medio de el southbridge ICH9 no tiene mayor diferencia, con el anterior ICH8. En esta ocación, G965 obtiene mejores resultados, es decir, tiene un mejor manejo sobre el procesador. ECS G33T-M2 | Overclock (click para agrandar) Un overclock bastante discreto el que pudimos lograr, un FSB de 285 Mhz, pero la placa pudo bootear a mas fsb, pero no de forma estable. La estabilidad se midió corriendo 3DMark 05, y un Super Pi de 32M.La placa no mostró la información de las memorias ni con Bios actualizada,

GPU Database GMA 3100 Specs Report an Error Graphics Processor Bearlake Pixel Shaders 4 Vertex Shaders N/A TMUs 4 ROPs 4 Memory Size System Shared Memory Type System Shared Bus Width System Shared Recommended Gaming Resolutions: 640x480 1280x720 1366x768 The GMA 3100 was an integrated graphics solution by Intel, launched on May 9th, 2007. Built on the 90 nm process, and based on the Bearlake graphics processor, in its Bearlake-G+ (G33) variant, the device supports DirectX 9.0c. Since GMA 3100 does not support DirectX 11 or DirectX 12, it might not be able to run all the latest games. It features 4 pixel shaders and 0 vertex shaders, 4 texture mapping units, and 4 ROPs. Due to the lack of unified shaders you will not be able to run recent games at all (which require unified shader/DX10+ support). The GPU is operating at a frequency of 400 MHz. Its power draw is rated at 13 W maximum. Graphics Processor GPU Name Bearlake GPU Variant Bearlake-G+ (G33) Architecture Generation 4.0 Foundry Intel Process Size 90 nm Transistors unknown Die Size unknown Integrated Graphics Clock Speeds GPU Clock 400 MHz Memory Clock System Shared Memory Memory Size System Shared Memory Type System Shared Memory Bus System Shared Bandwidth System Dependent Render Config Pixel Shaders 4 Vertex Shaders 0 TMUs 4 ROPs 4 Theoretical Performance Pixel Rate 1.600 GPixel/s Texture Rate 1.600 GTexel/s Board Design Slot Width IGP TDP 13 W Outputs Motherboard Dependent Graphics Features DirectX 9.0c OpenGL 2.0 OpenCL N/A Vulkan N/A Shader Model 3.0 Card Notes Bearlake GPU Notes G31, G33, G35, Q33 and Q35 Chipsets