Avast versions compared

Author: r | 2025-04-25

★★★★☆ (4.5 / 1693 reviews)

netframe 4.5

Avast WEBforum ; Consumer Products ; Avast Secure Browser ; Avast Secure Browser for Windows ; Update frequency of SafeZone versioning compared to Google Chrome

Download winx dvd author 6.3.4

Update frequency of SafeZone versioning compared - Avast

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚 Avast and AVG both stem from the same parent company and are essentially identical products, sharing the same anti-malware engine and largely mirroring each other in terms of features, pricing, and more. However, there are some differences between the two:Branding and App Interfaces: The main differences between Avast and AVG are in branding and app interfaces, which are minimal.Password Protection: Both Avast and AVG provide password protection capabilities, but AVG also notifies users if a password entered in the browser is weak, duplicated, or has been leaked online.Sandboxing: Avast includes sandboxing, which is not present in AVG.Scan Accuracy: Both Avast and AVG have highly accurate antivirus solutions with identical detection rates.Performance Impact: Avast is slightly more thorough in its scanning methods, which results in a higher impact on PC performance compared to AVG.Pricing: Some users argue that AVG offers more features with its free and paid versions and is cheaper than Avast.In summary, the main differences between Avast and AVG are in branding, app interfaces, and certain features like sandboxing and password protection. Both products offer highly accurate antivirus solutions, but Avast has a slightly higher impact on PC performance and may be more thorough in its scanning methods. The choice between the two largely depends on personal preference and specific needs.Comparative Table: Avast vs AVGHere is a table comparing the differences between Avast and AVG:FeatureAvastAVGInterfaceSimple and clear, some sections can be confusingMore modern, visual approach, easy to navigateScan Accuracy94.2% off-line detection rate, 99.5% online detection rate, 99.98% online protection rateIdentical scores to AvastImpact on PC PerformanceUses fewer system resources than AVGUses more system resources than Avast during a full scanFeaturesOffers more features, including SandboxOffers fewer features compared to Avast, but has a two-way password protectionPricingMore expensive, confusing pricing structureCheaper, more straightforward pricingBoth Avast and AVG have high malware detection rates and minimal impact on PC performance. AVG has a more modern and visually appealing interface, while Avast offers a few extra features, such as the Sandbox. However, AVG is generally considered a better antivirus than Avast due to its lower pricing and more features with both free and paid versions. Read more:Virus vs AntivirusAntivirus vs Internet SecurityFree AVG Android Security vs NetQin Android SecurityAntivirus vs FirewallMalware vs VirusAdware vs SpywareNorton Antivirus 2011 vs Norton Internet Security 2011MKV vs AVIAntiviral vs AntiretroviralVirus vs WormAVM vs AVFInternet Explorer vs FirefoxFrontline vs Frontline PlusFreeware vs SharewareAAV Avast WEBforum ; Consumer Products ; Avast Secure Browser ; Avast Secure Browser for Windows ; Update frequency of SafeZone versioning compared to Google Chrome You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. #1 Which is better and why?I have been using avast! Free Antivirus and was wondering if it's enough.I also have MBAM (on demand scanner) and SUPERAntiSpyware (On demand scanner). Are those enough or shall I bight the buller and buy NOD32? what more does it offer than avast! antivirus?Please tell me if it's worth it as I do not want to waste my moneyThanks #2 all these votes and not a single reply? #3 It's probably not worth paying for antivirus, unless you're talking from a business perspective. In my experience, all credible antivirus is more or less effective, and safe browsing habits are a much better way to keep yourself secure.That said, Avast! has been very good for a long time. I don't see a need to purchase NOD32. #4 I prefer "free-after-rebate" Kaspersky suite, but before installing an anti-virus, I would first install a good firewall like this. #5 I'd go with Avast, they have detection rates that rival most paid for AV packages. I run it on all of mine, except for one that it was causing blue screens of death on. I can't justify spending $$$ on a different program that has the same features, which they all do these days, just a different UI. #6 I'd go with Avast, they have detection rates that rival most paid for AV packages. I run it on all of mine, except for one that it was causing blue screens of death on. I can't justify spending $$$ on a different program that has the same features, which they all do these days, just a different UI. Thanks for the tip dude.I have installed avast! Free Antivirus and I like it so far! Doesn't hurt my performance at all as compared to my previous Kaspersky Internet Security! Even on my high end system as you can see from the sig, Kaspersky Internet Securit made my notebook crawl to death Aug 20, 2004 8,874 111 106 #7 I run Avast Free myself. Very light on system resources and works well. XP Pro SP3 on a P4 with 512MB of RAM #8 I like avast but i quit using it because it causes problems with windows vista not sure if win 7 has the same issue. Aug 21, 2011 3,921 177 106 #9 Avast free is pretty good imo and it seems to do its job on my pc. Or you could try the other big names which have free versions like Avira. AVG seems to have lost a step over the years. #10 Avast free is

Comments

User5041

🆚 Go to Comparative Table 🆚 Avast and AVG both stem from the same parent company and are essentially identical products, sharing the same anti-malware engine and largely mirroring each other in terms of features, pricing, and more. However, there are some differences between the two:Branding and App Interfaces: The main differences between Avast and AVG are in branding and app interfaces, which are minimal.Password Protection: Both Avast and AVG provide password protection capabilities, but AVG also notifies users if a password entered in the browser is weak, duplicated, or has been leaked online.Sandboxing: Avast includes sandboxing, which is not present in AVG.Scan Accuracy: Both Avast and AVG have highly accurate antivirus solutions with identical detection rates.Performance Impact: Avast is slightly more thorough in its scanning methods, which results in a higher impact on PC performance compared to AVG.Pricing: Some users argue that AVG offers more features with its free and paid versions and is cheaper than Avast.In summary, the main differences between Avast and AVG are in branding, app interfaces, and certain features like sandboxing and password protection. Both products offer highly accurate antivirus solutions, but Avast has a slightly higher impact on PC performance and may be more thorough in its scanning methods. The choice between the two largely depends on personal preference and specific needs.Comparative Table: Avast vs AVGHere is a table comparing the differences between Avast and AVG:FeatureAvastAVGInterfaceSimple and clear, some sections can be confusingMore modern, visual approach, easy to navigateScan Accuracy94.2% off-line detection rate, 99.5% online detection rate, 99.98% online protection rateIdentical scores to AvastImpact on PC PerformanceUses fewer system resources than AVGUses more system resources than Avast during a full scanFeaturesOffers more features, including SandboxOffers fewer features compared to Avast, but has a two-way password protectionPricingMore expensive, confusing pricing structureCheaper, more straightforward pricingBoth Avast and AVG have high malware detection rates and minimal impact on PC performance. AVG has a more modern and visually appealing interface, while Avast offers a few extra features, such as the Sandbox. However, AVG is generally considered a better antivirus than Avast due to its lower pricing and more features with both free and paid versions. Read more:Virus vs AntivirusAntivirus vs Internet SecurityFree AVG Android Security vs NetQin Android SecurityAntivirus vs FirewallMalware vs VirusAdware vs SpywareNorton Antivirus 2011 vs Norton Internet Security 2011MKV vs AVIAntiviral vs AntiretroviralVirus vs WormAVM vs AVFInternet Explorer vs FirefoxFrontline vs Frontline PlusFreeware vs SharewareAAV

2025-03-30
User3663

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. #1 Which is better and why?I have been using avast! Free Antivirus and was wondering if it's enough.I also have MBAM (on demand scanner) and SUPERAntiSpyware (On demand scanner). Are those enough or shall I bight the buller and buy NOD32? what more does it offer than avast! antivirus?Please tell me if it's worth it as I do not want to waste my moneyThanks #2 all these votes and not a single reply? #3 It's probably not worth paying for antivirus, unless you're talking from a business perspective. In my experience, all credible antivirus is more or less effective, and safe browsing habits are a much better way to keep yourself secure.That said, Avast! has been very good for a long time. I don't see a need to purchase NOD32. #4 I prefer "free-after-rebate" Kaspersky suite, but before installing an anti-virus, I would first install a good firewall like this. #5 I'd go with Avast, they have detection rates that rival most paid for AV packages. I run it on all of mine, except for one that it was causing blue screens of death on. I can't justify spending $$$ on a different program that has the same features, which they all do these days, just a different UI. #6 I'd go with Avast, they have detection rates that rival most paid for AV packages. I run it on all of mine, except for one that it was causing blue screens of death on. I can't justify spending $$$ on a different program that has the same features, which they all do these days, just a different UI. Thanks for the tip dude.I have installed avast! Free Antivirus and I like it so far! Doesn't hurt my performance at all as compared to my previous Kaspersky Internet Security! Even on my high end system as you can see from the sig, Kaspersky Internet Securit made my notebook crawl to death Aug 20, 2004 8,874 111 106 #7 I run Avast Free myself. Very light on system resources and works well. XP Pro SP3 on a P4 with 512MB of RAM #8 I like avast but i quit using it because it causes problems with windows vista not sure if win 7 has the same issue. Aug 21, 2011 3,921 177 106 #9 Avast free is pretty good imo and it seems to do its job on my pc. Or you could try the other big names which have free versions like Avira. AVG seems to have lost a step over the years. #10 Avast free is

2025-04-20
User8801

For home For business For partners About us Blogs Store Store Home Home Support Support Store Store Account Account Not sure which solution is right for your business? Resources Resources Trials Trials Store Store Home Home Contact Sales Contact Sales Support Support Store Store Account Account Smart Life Smart Life Mobile Security Mobile Security VPN VPN Threat Intelligence Threat Intelligence Knowledge Center Knowledge Center About Avast About Avast Careers Careers Privacy Expert guides Privacy blogs Digital trust Digital trust Press releases Events In the news Media materials PR contacts Awards Awards Contact us Contact us Avast Blog Read about recent news from the security world Avast Blog Read about recent news from the security world Avast Academy Expert tips and guides about digital security and privacy Avast Academy Expert tips and guides about digital security and privacy Avast Decoded In-depth technical articles regarding security threats Avast Decoded In-depth technical articles regarding security threats Avast Forum Discuss with the community Avast Forum Discuss with the community Privacy Policy Updates We are constantly working on improving our privacy practises and policies. In this archive you can check the previous versions of the policies. Archive of previous versions

2025-04-04

Add Comment